Correspondence: 'Interpreting urinary incontinence outcomes following pulmonary rehabilitation requires further methodological scrutiny'.

A correspondence published in Pulmonology raises methodological concerns about how urinary incontinence outcomes are measured and interpreted within pulmonary rehabilitation research. The authors argue that greater scrutiny of study design and outcome measurement is needed before drawing conclusions about the relationship between pulmonary rehabilitation and urinary incontinence. This has relevance for physical therapists working at the intersection of respiratory and pelvic floor rehabilitation.

Read full article at PubMed / Pulmonology ↗

About this summary. The text above is a short summary written for this site. The original article is hosted by PubMed / Pulmonology at the link above; this site does not reproduce the full article. Verify against the source before relying on specific details.